Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchutte, B.J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorTomasek, B.J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorDavis, A.S.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBenoit, D.L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCirujeda Ranzenberger, Aliciaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDekker, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorForcella, F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Andújar, J.L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGraziani, F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMurdoch, A.J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorNeve, P.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, I.A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSera, B.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSalonen, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorTei, F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorresen, K.S.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorUrbano, J.M.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationWeed Research, 54(1), p. 1-12en
dc.description.abstractEnhanced understanding of soil disturbance effects on weed seedling recruitment will help guide improved management approaches. Field experiments were conducted at 16 site-years at 10 research farms across Europe and North America to (i) quantify superficial soil disturbance (SSD) effects on Chenopodium album emergence and (ii) clarify adaptive emergence behaviour in frequently disturbed environments. Each site-year contained factorial combinations of two seed populations (local and common, with the common population studied at all site-years) and six SSD timings [0, 50, 100, 150, 200 day-degrees (d°C, base temperature 3°C) after first emergence from undisturbed soil]. Analytical units in this study were emergence flushes. Flush magnitudes (maximum weekly emergence per count flush) and flush frequencies (flushes year−1) were compared between disturbed and undisturbed seedbanks. One year after burial, SSD promoted seedling emergence relative to undisturbed seedbanks by increasing flush magnitude rather than increasing flush frequency. Two years after burial, SSD promoted emergence through increased flush magnitude and flush frequency. The promotional effects of SSD on emergence were strongest within 500 d°C following SSD; however, low levels of SSD-induced emergence were detected as late as 3000 d°C following SSD. Accordingly, stale seedbed practices that eliminate weed seedlings should occur within 500 d°C of disturbance, because few seedlings emerge after this time. However, implementation of stale seedbed practices will probably cause slight increases in weed population densities throughout the year. Compared with the common population, local populations exhibited reduced variance in total emergence measured within sites and across SSD treatments, suggesting that C. album adaptation to local pedo-climatic conditions involves increased consistency in SSD-induced emergenceen
dc.subject.othersanidad vegetal
dc.titleAn investigation to enhance understanding of the stimulation of weed seedling emergence by soil disturbanceen
dc.typeJournal Contribution*
dc.subject.agrovocInteracción genotipo ambientees
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleWeed Researchen
Appears in Collections:[DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2014_007.pdf329,76 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

La información de este repositorio es indexada en: