Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/2772
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Alibés, Mireiaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorJoy Torrens, Margalidaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlbertí Lasalle, Perees_ES
dc.contributor.authorRipoll García, Guillermoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCasasús Pueyo, Isabeles_ES
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-05T08:44:38Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05T08:44:38Z
dc.date.issued2014es_ES
dc.identifier.citationItalian Journal Of Animal Science, 13:3384, p. 864-872en
dc.identifier.issn1594-4077*
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/2772
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the performance and carcass quality of Parda de Montaña cattle under different management systems to find alternatives to concentrate feed indoor beef production. Treatments were: i) Control, with 8 bulls (216±34.3 kg initial weight; 282±45.6 days) fed concentrate and straw ad libitum during winter housing period until reaching 500 kg; ii) G-supp, with 8 steers (204±31.2 kg initial weight; 271±47.5 days) fed a total mixed ration (TMR) (50% alfalfa hay, 10% straw, 40% corn) ad libitum during winter housing period (from mid-April steers rotationally grazed on a mountain meadow supplemented with 1.8 kg dry matter corn/d until reaching 500 kg); iii) TMR, with 8 steers (200±42.5 kg initial weight; 261±39.0 days) managed as G-supp steers until mid-July, when they were housed and fed TMR ad libitum until reaching 500 kg. Control bulls had 45% greater weight gain than TMR and G-supp steers during housing period (P<0.001). In the finishing period, TMR had 31% greater weight gain than steers finished on pasture (P<0.01). At slaughter, Controls were 97-127 days younger than others (P<0.001). Steers finished on TMR had worse conformed carcasses, greater fat and fewer edible meat proportions than G-supp and Control (P<0.01). Total cost of TMR and Gsupp was greater than Control, with a similar income for G-supp and Control. TMR steers were paid less because of their worse carcass quality. Hence, finishing of steers on pasture with a supplement can be a feasible alternative to fattening bulls on concentrates, depending on the relative availability and price of feedstuff.en
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherproducción y sanidad animales_ES
dc.titlePerformance and carcass quality of forage-fed steers as an alternative to concentratebased beef productionen
dc.typeJournal Contribution*
dc.typeconferenceObject-
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume13:3384es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage864es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage872es_ES
dc.subject.agrovocComposición de la canales
dc.subject.agrovocGanado bovinoes
dc.subject.agrovocForrajeses
dc.subject.agrovocGranos piensoes
dc.subject.agrovocRendimiento cárnicoes
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.type.refereedNon-Refereedes_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleItalian Journal Of Animal Scienceen
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3384es_ES
Appears in Collections:[DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2014_343.pdf807,6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons