Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10532/2848
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Monserrat, M. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sanz, D. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Juan Esteban, Teresa | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Herrero, A. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez, L. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Calvo, M. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez, María D. | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-19T11:27:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-19T11:27:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.citation | Food Control, 54, p. 300-307 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0956-7135 | * |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10532/2848 | |
dc.description.abstract | Direct competitive and sandwich ELISA formats developed to determine Ara h1 and Ara h2 proteins were applied in the detection of peanut in model biscuits prepared with a commercial peanut butter as ingredient. The sandwich format for Ara h2 protein could detect the addition of 2.5% peanut butter, whereas the same format for Ara h1 could not detect 5% added peanut. Direct competitive formats for Ara h1 and Ara h2 proteins could detect the addition of 1% and 0.05% peanut butter, respectively. Therefore, competitive format for Ara h2 was selected to be evaluated by four laboratories, obtaining adequate results in term of repeatability and reproducibility. Results obtained indicate that processing decreased the level of extracted proteins and underestimated the amount of Ara h1 and Ara h2 proteins, the effect being more severe for Ara h1. The selection of the target protein and the ELISA format applied greatly influence the detection of peanut in processed foods. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject.other | otri | es_ES |
dc.title | Detection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergens in processed foods by immunoassay: Influence of selected target protein and ELISA format applied | en |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | * |
dc.description.version | Peer Reviewed | - |
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume | 54 | es_ES |
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage | 300 | es_ES |
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage | 307 | es_ES |
dc.subject.agrovoc | Alérgenos | es |
dc.subject.agrovoc | Técnicas inmunológicas | es |
dc.subject.agrovoc | Cacahuete | es |
dc.subject.agrovoc | Alimentos procesados | es |
dc.description.status | Published | es_ES |
dc.type.refereed | Non-Refereed | es_ES |
dc.type.specified | Article | es_ES |
dc.bibliographicCitation.title | Food Control | en |
dc.relation.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.01.049 | es_ES |
Aparece en las colecciones: | [DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015_056pprint.pdf | post print | 692,23 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons