Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/4937
Title: Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence
Authors: Ronzon, Tevecia
Sanjuán López, Ana Isabel
Issue Date: 2020
Citation: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 254, (2020)
Abstract: In October 2018, the European Union (EU) launched an updated bioeconomy strategy with the aim of encouraging the substitution of fossil carbon with biomass feedstock in the industry and in energy production while preserving ecosystem services. The objective of the paper is to analyse the links between the EU bioeconomy strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and to assess what could be the main points of synergies and tensions between bioeconomy-related SDG targets. By semantically mapping the action plan of the 2018 EU bioeconomy strategy with the SDG targets, the paper finds that the bioeconomy strategy is aligned with 53 targets distributed in 12 of the 17 SDGs. Ex-post correlation analysis on bioeconomy-related SDGs indicators for 28 EU Member States (1990–2018) shows a predominance of synergies over trade-offs. More intense synergetic past developments (positive correlations) are found among clean energies (SDG 7), recycling (SDG 11), ecosystem preservation (SDG 15) and most of all other bioeconomy-related SDGs. Negative correlations are observed between agro-biodiversity (SDG 2), domestic material consumption of biomass (SDG 8 and 12), agriculture and industrial developments (SDG 2 and SDG 9) and a wide array of bioeconomy-related SDG indicators. The hotspots of strong correlations identified might be useful in further enrichment of ex-ante simulation models. From a policy coherence perspective, a wide range of policy instruments are already in place in the EU to foster synergies and may bring co-benefits. Policies oriented at preventing trade-offs are already in place but they have not overcome the antagonisms observed in this study yet. Change in practices, technical and technological innovations and the application of circular and ‘cascading principles' are the most common fields of action.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/4937
Related document: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261934702X
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
Appears in Collections:[DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_003inpress.pdfArtículo en prensa21,02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
2020_003.pdfArtículo8,55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons