Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/2761
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSkhiri, Ahmedes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDechmi, Faridaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-05T09:38:19Z
dc.date.available2014-12-05T09:38:19Z
dc.date.issued2012es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCD-Rom Proceedings, May 27-June 1, 2012, Bari, Italy: Bari, Italia, 27 mayo - 1 junio 2012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/2761
dc.description.abstractSimulation models are useful tools to quantify the effects of best management practices (BMPs). After SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) adaptation and calibration for intensive irrigated watershed, it has been used to evaluate the impact of several (BMPs) on water yield (WYLD), total suspended sediment (TSS), organic P (ORG_P), soluble P (SOL_P), and total P (TP) at the outlet of the Del Reguero stream watershed (Spain). Economic impacts of the BMPs on crop gross margin were also evaluated. In total, 6 individual scenarios and 14 combinations of various management practices including tillage (conservation and no-tillage), fertilizer (incorporated, recommended, and zero), and irrigation (adjusted to crop needs) were been tested. Results indicate that the best individuals BMPs (adjusted irrigation water use BMP) reduced WYLD to 31.4%, TSS loads 33.5%, and TP loads to 12.8%, in comparison of the initial conditions. When individual BMPs were combined, the percentage reductions of losses were increased. The BMPs combination between optimum irrigation application, conservation tillage and reduced P fertilizer dose was the best analysed one with a TP loads reduction about 22.6%. For corn and alfalfa, the best BMP scenario was the combination between conservation tillage and reduced P fertilizer dose, reaching an increase of gross margin by 309 € ha-1and 188 € ha-1, respectively. While for sunflower and barley, the best scenario was the combination between irrigation adjustment, conservation tillage and reduced P fertilizer dose. The increase of gross margin under this BMP was about 171 € ha-1and 307 € ha-1, respectively.en
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherASABEes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesASABE Publication Number 701P0212cden
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.othersuelos y riegoses_ES
dc.titleEvaluation Of BMPs Scenarios For Minimizing Phosphorus And Sediments Transport In Sprinkler Irrigation Systemen
dc.typeProceedings Paper*
dc.typeconferenceObject-
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate27 mayo - 1 junio 2012es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencename21st Century Watershed Technology Workshops: Improving Water Quality and the Environmenten
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceBari, Italiaes_ES
dc.subject.agrovocRiego por aspersiónen
dc.subject.agrovocCalidad del aguaen
dc.subject.agrovocFósforoen
dc.subject.agrovocModelos de simulaciónen
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.type.refereedNon-Refereedes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnrPaper Number: 12-13657es_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleCD-Rom Proceedings, May 27-June 1, 2012, Bari, Italyen
Aparece en las colecciones: [DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
skhiri_evaluation.pdf633,42 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons

La información de este repositorio es indexada en: