Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/7446
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCirujeda Ranzenberger, Aliciaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPardo Sanclemente, Gabrieles_ES
dc.contributor.authorMarí León, Ana Isabeles_ES
dc.contributor.authorAibar Lete, Joaquínes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPallavicini, Y.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Andujar, J. L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRecasens, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSole-Senan, X. O.es_ES
dc.coverage.spatialSAFMAes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T09:41:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-22T09:41:36Z-
dc.date.issued2019es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCirujeda, A.; Pardo, G.; Mari, A. I.; Aibar, J.; Pallavicini, Y.; Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L.; Recasens, J.; Sole-Senan, X. O. The structural classification of field boundaries in Mediterranean arable cropping systems allows the prediction of weed abundances in the boundary and in the adjacent crop. Weed Research, 2019, 59, 4, 300-311-
dc.identifier.issn00431737-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/7446-
dc.description.abstractBoundary structure can hinder or facilitate disturbance of the boundary vegetation by farming practices, such as herbicide and fertiliser drift and occasional cultivation; this may affect their potential role as a weed reservoir. It would be relevant for researchers, farmers and legislators to know whether relationships exist between boundary structure and weed abundance and frequency in boundaries and adjacent fields. In this study, we present a classification of arable field boundaries based on five descriptors: presence of a bank, width, percentage cover of woody and evergreen perennials (WEP), presence of a stonewall and presence of trees. Five types of boundaries are identified, ranging from structurally simple ones (flat, narrow, dominated by annual species) to structurally complex ones (presence of a bank, more than 3 m wide, dominated by WEP). Data from three Spanish regions were used to validate this classification, and the five boundary classes contained different plant communities. Structurally simple, flat and narrow boundaries contained many of the weed species found also in the field centre and with high abundance. More complex, wider boundaries with a slope and a WEP >60%, had a lower probability of hosting the main weeds present in the field centres. Assessment of weed frequency and abundance gave complementary information. The proposed classification of field boundaries may be easily used by farmers and allows adjustment of field margin management to risks posed by the field boundary, in terms of hosting common weeds of arable crops.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank S. Murillo and R. Gurrucharri (Government of Aragon) for their help in choosing the boundaries and FEDER funds and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for supporting this work (Projects AGL2007-60828, AGL2010-22084- C02-02 and AGL2012-33736). YP was supported by an FPI (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) scholarship. XS was supported by a UdL (Universitat de Lleida) scholarship. Thanks to J. Torra, A. Royo and J.A. Conesa in the field surveys. Finally, we thank the reviewers, subject editor and EiC for useful improvements of the MSes_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12366es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.subject.otherAssemblages-
dc.subject.otherBank-
dc.subject.otherBiodiversity-
dc.subject.otherDiversity-
dc.subject.otherfertilizer-
dc.subject.otherField Margins-
dc.subject.otherFlora-
dc.subject.otherFunctional Traits-
dc.subject.othergrowth form-
dc.subject.otherImpact-
dc.subject.otherMargins-
dc.subject.otherMultivariate Analysis-
dc.subject.otherNon-metric multidimensional scaling-
dc.subject.otherperennial species-
dc.subject.otherWIDTH-
dc.titleThe structural classification of field boundaries in Mediterranean arable cropping systems allows the prediction of weed abundances in the boundary and in the adjacent cropen
dc.typeJournal Contribution*
dc.date.updated2025-01-21T12:48:08Z-
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume59es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage300es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage311es_ES
dc.subject.agrovocCultivos perenneen
dc.subject.agrovocVegetaciónen
dc.subject.agrovocMalezasen
dc.subject.agrovocLímiteen
dc.subject.agrovocParcelaen
dc.description.otherfield marginses
dc.description.otherbankes
dc.description.otherperennial specieses
dc.description.otherwidthes
dc.description.othermultivariate analysises
dc.description.othernon-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS)es
dc.description.otherfunctional traitses
dc.description.othergrowth formes
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.type.refereedRefereedes_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleWeed Researchen
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12366es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: [DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
5820823.pdf11,86 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons

La información de este repositorio es indexada en: