Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/5555
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Idioma
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Eduardoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorKrefting, Priskaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Achimes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDo, Hoaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFadón Adrián, Ericaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorLuedeling, Eikees_ES
dc.coverage.spatialHortofruticulturaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-30T06:48:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-30T06:48:33Z-
dc.date.issued2021es_ES
dc.identifier.citationAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 310, (2021)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/5555-
dc.description.abstractGlobal warming has modified the phenology of deciduous species. Temperature during the dormancy phase modulates the timing of bloom in temperate trees. Chill and heat requirements represent the climatic needs of trees during dormancy. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression allows delineating chilling and forcing phases, which in turn allows estimating the trees’ requirements. However, PLS regression requires long-term phenology and weather data, which are scarce in many growing regions. In a two-year experiment, we generated long-term phenology data by exposing potted trees to distinct environments during winter. We obtained records for 66 and 32 experimental seasons in apple and pear, respectively. We recorded tree phenology and hourly temperature. Through PLS regression methods, we determined the impacts of inter-seasonal variation on the outputs, estimated species’ dormancy phases and needs (in Chill Portions – CP and Growing Degree Hours – GDH), and assessed the relationship between bloom and temperature during the chilling and forcing phases. Results suggest inter-seasonal variation may be more important than number of seasons for producing valuable outputs. We delineated the chilling phase from October 19 to January 04 for apple and October 19 to December 27 for pear. The forcing period for both species was January 16 – March 26. Median chill and heat requirements were estimated as 43 CP and 14,845 GDH for apple and 31 CP and 11,816 GDH for pear. Bloom was modulated by temperature during both phases under warm conditions. In cold scenarios, bloom was mostly defined by temperatures during the forcing phase. We expanded the reach of the PLS regression method and made it applicable for cultivars lacking long-term phenology data. Our approach helps dormancy researchers improve their procedures to analyze species’ responses under possible future conditions. This work may assist farmers and orchard managers in adapting their orchards to face future challenges.en
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192321003385es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.titleBoosting statistical delineation of chill and heat periods in temperate fruit trees through multi-environment observationsen
dc.typeJournal Contribution*
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume310es_ES
dc.subject.agrovocÁrboles frutaleses
dc.subject.agrovocClima templadoes
dc.subject.agrovocCambio climáticoes
dc.subject.agrovocDormiciónes
dc.subject.agrovocFenologíaes
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.type.refereedRefereedes_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleAgricultural And Forest Meteorologyen
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108652es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: [DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
2021_321.pdf6,16 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons

La información de este repositorio es indexada en: