Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/2341
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDechmi, Faridaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSkhiri, Ahmedes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-11T11:59:17Z
dc.date.available2013-10-11T11:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2013es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0378-3774*
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/2341
dc.description.abstractLand management practices such as conservation tillage and optimum irrigation are routinely used to reduce non-point source pollution and improve water quality. The calibrated and validated SWAT-IRRIG model is the first modified SWAT version that reproduces well the irrigation return flows (IRF) when the irrigation source is outside of the watershed. The application of this SWAT version in intensive irrigated systems permits to better evaluate the best management practices (BMPs) in such systems. This paper evaluates several BMPs on IRF, total suspended sediment (TSS), organic P (ORG_P), soluble P (SOL_P), and total P (TP) at the outlet Del Reguero stream watershed (Spain). Economic impacts of the BMPs on crop gross margin were also evaluated. In total, 20 BMPs scenarios were tested. The BMPs proposed considered tillage (conservation and no-tillage), fertilizer application (incorporated, recommended, and reduced), and irrigation (adjusted to crop needs). The measured data series corresponding to 2008 and 2009 years were considered to estimate IRF, TSS, ORG_P, SOL_P and TP losses as a reference to assess the effects of the considered BMPs. The results indicate that the best individual BMP (adjusted irrigation water use) reduced IRF by 31.4%, TSS loads by 33.5% and TP loads by 12.8%. When individual BMPs were combined, the load reductions were even increased. The BMP scenario combining optimum irrigation application, conservation tillage and reduced P fertilizer dose was the best, leading to a TP load reduction of about 22.6%. For corn and alfalfa, the best BMP scenario was the combination between conservation tillage and reduced P fertilizer dose, increasing the crop gross margin by 309 € ha−1 and 188 € ha−1, respectively. For sunflower and barley, the best scenario combined the adjusted irrigation water use, conservation tillage and reduced P fertilizer dose (gross margin increase of 171 € ha−1 and 307 € ha−1, respectively).en
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.othersuelos y riegoses_ES
dc.titleEvaluation of best management practices under intensive irrigation using SWAT modelen
dc.typearticle*
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume123es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage55es_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage64es_ES
dc.subject.agrovocSistemas de riegoes
dc.subject.agrovocEvaluaciónes
dc.description.otherNutrients management practicesen
dc.description.otherNutrients lossesen
dc.description.otherPhosphorusen
dc.description.otherSediment yielden
dc.description.otherTillageen
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.type.refereedNon-Refereedes_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleAgricultural Water Managementen
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.016es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: [DOCIART] Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
2013_084autor.pdf235,93 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons

La información de este repositorio es indexada en: