Comparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lam

dc.bibliographicCitation.titlePhysiologia Plantarumen
dc.contributor.authorNadal Nadal, Miqueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorPeguero Pina, José Javieres_ES
dc.contributor.authorSancho Knapik, Domingoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGil Pelegrín, Eustaquioes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-03T07:11:32Z
dc.date.available2025-04-03T07:11:32Z
dc.date.issued2025es_ES
dc.date.updated2025-03-27T11:22:06Z
dc.description.abstractDetermination of the point of critical damage in plant organs is crucial to elucidate the causes of plant mortality, but the different methodologies to quantify such damage have not been previously compared under the same experimental conditions. Here, we tested different indicators to evaluate damage in leaves of Quercus faginea and Q. ilex; in the latter case, 1- and 2-year-old leaves were included. The damage indicators were relative electrolyte leakage (REL), rehydration capacity (evaluated as the percentage loss of rehydration capacity; PLRC), chlorophyll fluorescence (maximum quantum yield of PSII; Fv/Fm), and the viability marker triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). These damage indicators were evaluated in different sets of detached leaves for each species and leaf age dehydrated on the lab bench. Electrolyte leakage and PLRC showed a gradual response to decreasing relative water content, whereas Fv/Fm and TTC showed a threshold-like response, especially in the case of Q. faginea. Electrolyte leakage and TTC did not show differences between species and/or leaf ages. Measurement of Fv/Fm in dehydrating leaves proved to be the most straightforward, rapid and precise method for damage quantification, allowing for the differentiation in dehydration tolerance between Q. ilex and Q. faginea.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEsta investigación ha contado con el apoyo de la beca PID2022-136478OB-C32 financiada por MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (España) y por «FEDER Una manera de hacer Europa», de la beca CNS2022-136156 financiada por MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (España) y la Unión Europea ('Next Generation EU'/PRTR) y del grupo de investigación S74_23R del Gobierno de Aragón. MN recibió el apoyo de la beca postdoctoral Juan de la Cierva-Formación (FJC2020-043902-I), financiada por MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 y la Unión Europea ('Next Generation EU'/PRTR).es_ES
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.identifier.citationNadal, M., Peguero-Pina, J. J., Sancho-Knapik, D., & Gil-Pelegrín, E. (2025). Comparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lam. Physiologia Plantarum, 177(2), e70178. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70178
dc.identifier.issn00319317
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/7573
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70178es_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70178es_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Internacionales_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject.agrovocQuercus fagineaes
dc.subject.agrovocQuercus ilexes
dc.subject.agrovocPolielectrolitoses
dc.subject.agrovocRehidrataciónes
dc.subject.agrovocFluorescencia de clorofilaes
dc.subject.agrovocDeshidrataciónes
dc.subject.agrovocDaño vegetales
dc.subject.agrovocÓrganos vegetativos de las plantases
dc.subject.otherDaño Vegetal
dc.subject.otherDeshidratación
dc.subject.otherElectrolitos
dc.subject.otherFluorescencia de clorofila
dc.subject.otherMortalidad
dc.subject.otherÓrganos Vegetativos De Las Plantas
dc.subject.otherQuercus faginea
dc.subject.otherQuercus ilex
dc.subject.otherRehidratación
dc.titleComparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lamen
dc.typearticle*
dc.type.refereedRefereedes_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10144210.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher version