Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Pabloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCaparrós, Alejandroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorOviedo, José L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorOvando, Paolaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Farizo, Begoñaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Balteiro, Luises_ES
dc.contributor.authorCarranza, Juanes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBeguería, Santiagoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, Marioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorHerruzo, A. Casimiroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Peña, Fernandoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSoliño, Marioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, Alejandroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Jáuregui, Maríaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPasalodos Tato, Maríaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorde Frutos, Pabloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAldea, Jorgees_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlmazán, Eloyes_ES
dc.contributor.authorConcepción, Elena D.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMesa, Brunoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Carloses_ES
dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Notivoli, Robertoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Cristinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Porras, Jerónimoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Gregorioes_ES
dc.coverage.spatialRecursos forestaleses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T20:12:21Z
dc.date.available2018-04-16T20:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2018es_ES
dc.description.abstractNational accounting either ignores or fails to give due values to a country´s ecosystem services, products, total income and environmental asset variations. To overcome these shortcomings, we develop a spatially-explicit extended ecosystem accounting framework, which we test in the Mediterranean forests of Andalusia (Spain). This framework goes beyond the production boundary of standard national accounting by considering four private activities (forestry, hunting, residential and private amenity) and six public activities (mushroom, carbon, water, recreation, landscape and threatened biodiversity). To keep valuation consistent with standard accounts, we simulate exchange values for non-market goods and services. Manufactured capital and environmental assets are also integrated. Upon comparing extended to standard accounts, our results are 3.7 and 2.9 higher for gross value added and total income, respectively. These differences are explained primarily by the undervaluation of recreation, landscape and threatened biodiversity, and the omission of private amenity, carbon and water activities in standard accounts. Extended accounts, with their implementation of simulated exchange values, demonstrate that standard accounts measures only 17% of Andalusian forest ecosystem services.en
dc.description.statusPublishedes_ES
dc.format.pages183es_ES
dc.identifier.citationWorking Paper, 2017-04 (2017)es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10532/4005
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherInstituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (CSIC)es_ES
dc.publisher.placeMadrides_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnr2017-04es_ES
dc.relation.urihttp://ipp.csic.es/sites/default/files/content/workpaper/2017/2017_04_ippwp_campos_etal.pdfes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.agrovocEcosistemaes
dc.subject.agrovocSistemas agroforestaleses
dc.titleBridging the gap between national and ecosystem accountingen
dc.typeResearch Report*
dc.type.refereedRefereedes_ES
dc.type.specifiedArticlees_ES

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018_070.pdf
Size:
26.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos científicos, técnicos y divulgativos