Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Isla Climente, RamónValentín Madrona, Francisco
Maturano, Marisa
Aibar Lete, Joaquín
Guillén Castillo, Mónica
Quílez y Sáez de Viteri, Dolores
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Typology
Journal ContributionArticle
Abstract
The gap between scientifically sound nitrogen (N) fertilizer application rates and the actual rates used by farmers in maize is still significant. The improvement of nitrogen use efficiency in such a highly N-demanding crop is necessary to decrease the negative effects of N fertilization. The objective was to compare the performance of different N management treatments in maize grown under semiarid Mediterranean sprinkler-irrigated conditions to the standard farmer practice. We compared an agronomically sound fixed rate of N fertilizer (FR) with a variable N rate obtained based on a soil mineral balance at pre-planting (SB) or based on a portable chlorophyll meter readings (CM) made just before tasseling. Additional treatments were a N control, without fertilizer (T0), and a non-limiting N (NL) treatment wich was typical of the current farmer practice. The study was replicated at 5 sites in one-year experiments and under 3 pre-planting soil mineral nitrogen environments (SMN, Low, Medium, and High). The results demonstrate the potential to reduce N rates from zero to 236 kg N ha−1 compared to the NL in irrigated maize fields without compromising yields in most of the situations with a subsequent increase of NUE. Averaging over sites, the use of fine-tuning N fertilizer strategies that considered field-specific conditions (SB and CM) reduced N rates (38 %) compared to the reductions under the FR strategy (26 %) relative to the NL conditions, which is the treatment closest to a typical farmer`s application rate.
Description
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
European Journal Of Agronomy, vol. 116, (2020)
AGROVOC subjects
MaízNitrógeno
Polución difusa
Eficacia en el uso de nutrientes
Análisis del suelo
Riego por aspersión





